Vaccine tourism, and the latest war of words over Ford's demand for pre-departure PCR testing for domestic flights

IATA urges governments to accept best-in-class rapid antigen tests instead of PCR tests

GENEVA — Testing will play a critical role as travel reopens post-pandemic and with that in mind IATA is urging governments to accept rapid antigen tests, rather than the most costly and far less convenient PCR tests, for COVID -19 testing requirements.

A new IATA-commissioned report from OXERA-Edge Health found that antigen tests are accurate, convenient and cost-effective. 

With some countries, including Canada, currently insisting on PCR tests, IATA is calling on all governments to green-light best-in-class rapid antigen tests instead, with an eye to restarting international travel and the economy.

“Restarting international aviation will energize the economic recovery from COVID-19,” said Alexandre de Juniac, IATA’s Director General and CEO. “Along with vaccines, testing will play a critical role in giving governments the confidence to re-open their borders to travellers. For governments, the top priority is accuracy. But travellers will also need tests to be convenient and affordable. The OXERA-Edge Health report tells us that the best-in-class antigen tests can tick all these boxes. It’s important for governments to consider these findings as they make plans for a re-start.”

Testing requirements are currently fragmented, causing confusion for travellers, says de Juniac, adding that PCR tests come with significant costs disadvantages and inconvenience. Plus, in some parts of the world, PCR testing capacity is limited.

“Travellers need options,” says de Juniac. “Including antigen testing among acceptable tests will certainly give strength to the recovery. And the EU’s specification of acceptable antigen tests offers a good baseline for wider international harmonization of acceptable standards. We now need to see governments implement these recommendations. The goal is to have a clear set of testing options that are medically effective, financially accessible, and practically available to all prospective travellers.”

The OXERA-Edge Health report can be found here. Highlights include:


The report notes that the best antigen tests provide broadly comparable results to PCR tests in accurately identifying infected travellers. The BinaxNOW antigen test, for example, misses just one positive case in 1000 travellers (based on an infection rate of 1% among travellers). And it has similarly comparable performance to PCR tests in levels of false negatives.




Processing times for antigen tests are 100 times faster than for PCR testing. In addition to dramatically shorter processing times for antigen testing when compared to PCR, the report also pointed to the scarcity of PCR tests. Current spare PCR testing capacity in the UK, for example, would cover only 25% of 2019 passenger levels. This could cause bottlenecks as and when passenger numbers rebound. Adding antigen testing as an acceptable option would help to alleviate this.

‘When international travel reopens testing is likely to remain part of the strategy for controlling COVID. The type of testing regime chosen will make the difference in how quickly the travel industry recovers. The choice of a rapid test would be a real boost to the global travel and international business community, and our research shows it can be as effective as other testing regimes and as effective as a ten-day quarantine,’ said Michele Granatstein, Partner at Oxera and Head of its Aviation Practice.

Adds de Juniac: “We are already seeing rapid testing becoming commonplace in non-travel settings such as schools and workplaces. Extending its use to travel is a logical step. Science backs this up. In real world conditions, antigen testing is as effective as PCR testing in reducing the risk of cross-border transmission. Meanwhile the cost and bureaucracy of PCR tests adds huge burdens to families and businesses looking to travel. These are important considerations in preparing for a successful re-start.”


Antigen tests are, on average, 60% cheaper than PCR tests. If rapid tests are not an option for travelers, significant cost and convenience barriers are created. The OXERA-Edge Health report presented the following analysis:

  • The cost of PCR testing can completely alter the economics of travel. A family of four traveling from the UK to the Canary Islands will take a total of 16 tests at a total cost of around GBP1,600 or EUR1,850 – a premium of 160% on top of the average air fare.
  • A typical London-Frankfurt business trip sees a cost increase of 59% with the PCR test requirement.
  • The modelling shows that based on five routes studied (London-New York, London-Frankfurt, UK-Singapore, UK-Pakistan and Manchester-Canary Islands) the cost impact of PCR testing will reduce demand by an average of 65%. Replacing PCR with antigen testing would still have a cost impact on demand, but at 30%.

De Juniac says financial barriers will dampen traveller sentiment which already displays some weakness. In a February 2021 poll of travellers, 58% said that they will travel less for leisure once the pandemic is contained. The same poll saw 62% of business travellers say they would be traveling less. 

Get travel news right to your inbox!